The Frighteners

Has maybe not aged flawlessly, but it's very silly and very involved in a good kind of way. Kind of feels like a spoof but I'm honestly not sure what of, so I think that it's maybe just a light toned take on some pretty dark subject matter. It's been about 20 years since I last watched The Frighteners and I think I could probably go about that long before I watch it again, but I still do think it's worthwhile. _Final rating:★★★ - I liked it. Would personally recommend you give it a go._

### **Review: *The Frighteners (1996)*** **Score: 7/10** *The Frighteners* is a fascinating, energetic, and gloriously uneven goulash of a film—a horror-comedy-ghost-mystery that showcases Peter Jackson's wild imagination in full bloom during his transition from gross-out splatter to blockbuster fantasy. It's a film brimming with brilliant ideas and technical wizardry, hamstrung slightly by a tonal identity crisis, but ultimately winning you over with its sheer creative verve and a game cast led by a perfectly cast Michael J. Fox. **What Works (The High Points):** * **Michael J. Fox's Magnetic Charm:** Fox is the film's beating heart. As Frank Bannister, a conman psychic who genuinely communes with the dead, he delivers his signature everyman charm laced with a world-weary sadness. He makes the outrageous premise feel grounded and gives the frenetic plot a crucial emotional anchor. * **Pioneering Visual Effects & Design:** This is where Jackson's genius shines. The CGI ghosts, while dated in texture, are brimming with personality and inventive, cartoony physics that still hold a unique charm. The design of the main antagonist, a terrifying, cloak-like Reaper, is a standout piece of pre-Weta Workshop visual storytelling that creates genuine moments of dread. * **A Supporting Cast of Delights:** The ensemble is a blast. Jeffrey Combs steals every scene as a deranged, paranoid FBI agent in a performance of unhinged, scenery-chewing perfection. Dee Wallace Stone and Jake Busey create a genuinely disturbing villainous duo, and the trio of Frank's ghostly accomplices provide consistent, spooky comic relief. **Why It's a 7, Not an 8 or 9 (The Uneven Ride):** * **Tonal Whiplash:** The film struggles to balance its competing impulses. It lurches from broad, almost *Beetlejuice*-style comedy to genuinely grim horror involving serial murder and disturbing flashbacks. The shifts can be jarring, preventing the film from settling into a cohesive groove and diluting the impact of both its scares and its laughs. * **A Overstuffed, Convoluted Plot:** The mystery at the film's core becomes unnecessarily tangled in its own mythology. Subplots about past murders, ghostly rules, and a climactic showdown in a haunted hospital sometimes feel like a series of cool set-pieces in search of a streamlined narrative. * **A Missed Emotional Beat:** While Frank's backstory is tragic, the film's breakneck pace doesn't always allow its emotional core—his grief and redemption—to resonate as deeply as it should. The spectacle occasionally overshadows the heart. **The Verdict:** *The Frighteners* is not a seamless masterpiece, but it is an essential and wildly entertaining cult classic. It's a film to be admired for its boundless creativity, its fearless blending of genres, and its role as a clear runway for Peter Jackson's *Lord of the Rings* ambitions. You watch it for the spectacularly weird moments: Combs' manic energy, the ingenious ghost effects, and Michael J. Fox outrunning the Grim Reaper. It's messy, inventive, and thoroughly unique—a Halloween-season delight that earns its **7/10** for pure, unfiltered imaginative spirit, even if it can't quite corral all its brilliant ghosts into a perfectly harmonious haunt. **Watch if:** You love 90s genre mash-ups, inventive practical and early-CGI effects, Peter Jackson's early work, or Jeffrey Combs at his most unhinged. **Skip if:** You prefer tonally consistent horror or tightly plotted narratives. This is a chaotic, loveable mess.